Well, this is a bit of a self plug, but I recently released a new web app called FreeTrakr. It's a SaaS (Software as a Service) that's aimed at freelancers , sole traders and even small businesses who need to track their hours and make invoices.
The whole thing came about when I became a freelance developer, and manually recording my hours in a spreadsheet took ages. I also had my laptop stolen, which had all my invoices on, so I was really aware that my data wasn't really safe. So FreeTrakr was born out of necessity. Since then I've stopped going freelance and went full time, but for the last 6 months I've been working nearly every night on getting this out.
So to really give it a kick start, everyone who creates an account on FreeTrakr will get 3 months free. I'm hoping that in those three months plenty of people will have tried it and given me enough feedback to get it out of the Beta stage.
Let me know what you think!
Wednesday, 11 April 2012
Wednesday, 22 December 2010
Steam Sales - Thursday 23rd
Right, we're now onto the third day of sales, and I must admit that it's a good one today. At this rate I'll have to buy a new hard-drive...
Anyway, onto the top five for today:
1. Right at the top of my list today is Just Cause 2. Although the driving in this game can be a bit...funky, it's one of the most beautifully crafted games I have ever played. The cut scenes are top notch and it improves infinitely over the original. At just a fiver, you would be a complete plonker to pass this one up.
2. Second up is Alien vs. Predator. It's fairly simple and it looks scary. Do you really need any more reasons to buy it for £3.75?
3. Third on my list today is Trials 2 : Second Edition. If you liked TG MotoCross 3, then you'll like this.
4. Fourth up is Clones. Essentially It's Lemmings, but with Aliens. Something to buy your mother maybe... (I mean that in a good way!)
5. And last on my list is Assassin's Creed 2. Although half price isn't a massive saving, it's not bad for a game of this calibre. If you have the budget, buy it.
Anyway, onto the top five for today:
1. Right at the top of my list today is Just Cause 2. Although the driving in this game can be a bit...funky, it's one of the most beautifully crafted games I have ever played. The cut scenes are top notch and it improves infinitely over the original. At just a fiver, you would be a complete plonker to pass this one up.
2. Second up is Alien vs. Predator. It's fairly simple and it looks scary. Do you really need any more reasons to buy it for £3.75?
3. Third on my list today is Trials 2 : Second Edition. If you liked TG MotoCross 3, then you'll like this.
4. Fourth up is Clones. Essentially It's Lemmings, but with Aliens. Something to buy your mother maybe... (I mean that in a good way!)
5. And last on my list is Assassin's Creed 2. Although half price isn't a massive saving, it's not bad for a game of this calibre. If you have the budget, buy it.
Tags : Steam, Sales, Christmas, Trials 2, Clones, Assassin's Creed 2, Just Cause 2, Alien vs Predator
Steam Sales - Wednesday 22nd
Okay, so we have a new set of sales today. I'm not as overwhelmed today as I was yesterday, but I think that's mostly down to having owned most of the games that are on sale already. Despite that, there are some very good choices. Here is my top 5 list for today :
Top 5 List:
1. At the top it's got to be Burnout : Paradise. You're getting a highly polished for £3.75, so really...there isn't much to complain about. The game has been around for a while and the multiplayer is mostly dead, but the format of the game (which is a combination of free roam and 'sprint' racing) makes it a must have.
2. Coming in second is The Witcher. Being a highly acclaimed game, with practically every award under the sun, it would be stupid not to pick it up for £3.25. It's not made by Bethesda, which means we should get a completely different feel to most of the other major RPG's that are currently floating around on the market. A proper review will follow in the New Year.
3. Defense Grid : The Awakening is one of those games that turned popular flash 'tower defense' into a wonderful mainstream 3D marvel. It's been on sale before, but that's no reason to pick up a copy if you haven't already got it.
4. Coming fourth on my list is Bioshock 2. When this came out, I was really anticipating a game which was roughly on the same lines and calibre of the original. I quickly found that it wasn't, and truth be told, I was a bit disappointed. Despite that, at £6.99 you can't really go wrong. It's worth getting it just to find out for yourself how much you prefer Bioshock.
5. Coming up last, but by no means least, is The Polynomial. I was a bit torn on this one, simply because I couldn't decide whether the new Lara Croft is actually a good game or not. I decided not to put it on my list simply because it doesn't hold true to what Lara Croft games are really about, and that's big tits and big guns. There's a strange American Indian and you have to work together? No...that's really not Lara Croft. So, instead of that, I've opted for The Polynomial. It doesn't really have an aim as a such. You just listen to some music and fly around trying to shoot little round monsters which are gobbling up your colourful alien friends. It's fairly mindless and is a nice way to relax. (Maybe something more for the "laaaydies")
Top 5 List:
1. At the top it's got to be Burnout : Paradise. You're getting a highly polished for £3.75, so really...there isn't much to complain about. The game has been around for a while and the multiplayer is mostly dead, but the format of the game (which is a combination of free roam and 'sprint' racing) makes it a must have.
2. Coming in second is The Witcher. Being a highly acclaimed game, with practically every award under the sun, it would be stupid not to pick it up for £3.25. It's not made by Bethesda, which means we should get a completely different feel to most of the other major RPG's that are currently floating around on the market. A proper review will follow in the New Year.
3. Defense Grid : The Awakening is one of those games that turned popular flash 'tower defense' into a wonderful mainstream 3D marvel. It's been on sale before, but that's no reason to pick up a copy if you haven't already got it.
4. Coming fourth on my list is Bioshock 2. When this came out, I was really anticipating a game which was roughly on the same lines and calibre of the original. I quickly found that it wasn't, and truth be told, I was a bit disappointed. Despite that, at £6.99 you can't really go wrong. It's worth getting it just to find out for yourself how much you prefer Bioshock.
5. Coming up last, but by no means least, is The Polynomial. I was a bit torn on this one, simply because I couldn't decide whether the new Lara Croft is actually a good game or not. I decided not to put it on my list simply because it doesn't hold true to what Lara Croft games are really about, and that's big tits and big guns. There's a strange American Indian and you have to work together? No...that's really not Lara Croft. So, instead of that, I've opted for The Polynomial. It doesn't really have an aim as a such. You just listen to some music and fly around trying to shoot little round monsters which are gobbling up your colourful alien friends. It's fairly mindless and is a nice way to relax. (Maybe something more for the "laaaydies")
Tags : Steam, Sales, Christmas, Burnout : Paradise, Lara Croft, The Polynomial, Defense Grid, The Witcher, Bioshock 2
Monday, 20 December 2010
Massive Steam Sales! - Awesome!
Valve has started the countdown to Christmas by unleashing one of the slickest sale campaigns to date.
For those of you who are feeling lethargic...here's the link :
http://store.steampowered.com/
You might notice that the site is a bit slow, but at the moment there is probably about 2 million people looking at it. And no...I'm not joking.
So lets look at some of more noteworthy products that are on sale today. Considering the sheer enormity of these sales, I'll try my best to give a quick rundown each day of the best buys.
Top 5 List :
1. First up is Peggle and Peggle Nights. Popcap Games hit the jackpot with these two highly addictive games. If you're wanting to get your family members into to gaming, or you like pretty flashing colours, these are definitely worth buying at £5.59.
2. Second is the Deus Ex pack, which includes the original Deus Ex and Deus Ex : Invisible War. I'm not too hot on the sequel of the original epic released a decade ago, but at £1.49 there's no excuse to take a trip down memory lane.
3. Coming in at third for me is Trine. Although Valve has 13 Indie packs on sale at the moment, a lot of them have already been on sale before. If you didn't take advantage of these earlier packs, grab yourself the "Heavy Hitters" Pack at £13.99 (which includes Trine) and the 2D Pack which comes in at just £3.99.
4. At fourth we've got the incredible Portal. If you already own Half Life 2, you'll be able to pick it up for £1.50. Without HL2, you can get it for £2.49. I really shouldn't have to explain why you need Portal in your life... so all I'm going to say is "The cake is a lie!"......
5. Although we're at the bottom of my list, this is by no means the worst deal in the sale. Epic's Unreal Deal Pack is a definite must. At £7.99 your getting some of the best FPS's to date. Some of the games are a little old, but if you don't have them already this pack will introduce you to a whole new level of community driven online shoot'em ups.
Now, this close to Christmas, I wouldn't suggest buying some of the newer games. There aren't any major sales on this years releases, so it might be worth waiting until the new year to see what you can pick up. IT also might be prudent to see what you get in your stockings in 5 days.
http://store.steampowered.com/
You might notice that the site is a bit slow, but at the moment there is probably about 2 million people looking at it. And no...I'm not joking.
So lets look at some of more noteworthy products that are on sale today. Considering the sheer enormity of these sales, I'll try my best to give a quick rundown each day of the best buys.
Top 5 List :
1. First up is Peggle and Peggle Nights. Popcap Games hit the jackpot with these two highly addictive games. If you're wanting to get your family members into to gaming, or you like pretty flashing colours, these are definitely worth buying at £5.59.
2. Second is the Deus Ex pack, which includes the original Deus Ex and Deus Ex : Invisible War. I'm not too hot on the sequel of the original epic released a decade ago, but at £1.49 there's no excuse to take a trip down memory lane.
3. Coming in at third for me is Trine. Although Valve has 13 Indie packs on sale at the moment, a lot of them have already been on sale before. If you didn't take advantage of these earlier packs, grab yourself the "Heavy Hitters" Pack at £13.99 (which includes Trine) and the 2D Pack which comes in at just £3.99.
4. At fourth we've got the incredible Portal. If you already own Half Life 2, you'll be able to pick it up for £1.50. Without HL2, you can get it for £2.49. I really shouldn't have to explain why you need Portal in your life... so all I'm going to say is "The cake is a lie!"......
5. Although we're at the bottom of my list, this is by no means the worst deal in the sale. Epic's Unreal Deal Pack is a definite must. At £7.99 your getting some of the best FPS's to date. Some of the games are a little old, but if you don't have them already this pack will introduce you to a whole new level of community driven online shoot'em ups.
Now, this close to Christmas, I wouldn't suggest buying some of the newer games. There aren't any major sales on this years releases, so it might be worth waiting until the new year to see what you can pick up. IT also might be prudent to see what you get in your stockings in 5 days.
Tags : Steam, Peggle, Valve, Trine, Epic, Unreal, Deus Ex, Portal, Half Life, Indie Packs, Sale, Christmas
Wednesday, 20 October 2010
Wednesday, 17 February 2010
Wednesday, 10 February 2010
Something I didn't know about Google Chrome
I've been using Google Chrome now for quite a while. since I originally downloaded it, Chrome has quickly found it's way to my nerdy heart...and boy have I been rewarded. Although Chrome was amazing when I started using it, there were a few faults. Firstly, there was a lack of add-on support, and secondly, I never quite knew why it sometimes used so many resources. The former was eventually included as a feature ,and I must say that with that feature in particular it beats Firefox hands down. I personally have never had issues with the latter on my desktop, however on my Netbook I am constantly aware of system performance and resources usage. I have never had a problem running Chrome on any of my PC's (that's including my Netbook), but sometimes it's nice to know how the resources are being used.
So, as I was reading about some Google Chrome shortcuts, I came across the "Shift + Esc" shortcut. If you press that, the Google Chrome Task Manager pops up. It's actually a very useful little gimmick. It tells you how much RAM, CPU and Bandwidth is being used by all your open tabs, the browser itself, and all the add-ons. This is handy if you ever need to troubleshoot some performance issues or want to squeeze as much speed out of Chrome as you possible can.
I'm also becoming increasingly fond of the F11 shortcut, which puts Chrome into full screen mode. This is nice if you want to browse without the clutter around.
So, as I was reading about some Google Chrome shortcuts, I came across the "Shift + Esc" shortcut. If you press that, the Google Chrome Task Manager pops up. It's actually a very useful little gimmick. It tells you how much RAM, CPU and Bandwidth is being used by all your open tabs, the browser itself, and all the add-ons. This is handy if you ever need to troubleshoot some performance issues or want to squeeze as much speed out of Chrome as you possible can.
I'm also becoming increasingly fond of the F11 shortcut, which puts Chrome into full screen mode. This is nice if you want to browse without the clutter around.
Final Thought Byte : I never cease to be amazed by Google's innovation. I strongly recommend looking at their list of shortcuts because you'll never know what you'll find.
Tags : Google, Chrome, Task Manager, Firefox, Internet
Monday, 30 November 2009
Your Blog e-mail
Looky here! I got this e-mail a couple of minutes ago :
Hey Blogger - My name is David,
I have been searching the Internet for blogs that match our criteria and I wanted to invite you to become a paid blogger at Blog Distributor. (Please understand that I do not send this invitation to every blogger I come across, nor is this a guaranteed acceptance as we can't do a true review of the blog until it reaches our blog analysts').
Roughly 25% of bloggers are now being paid to write postings on their blogs, that are linked to websites. The value here is that, when a blog posting is linked to a website, that website will get higher rankings in the search engines, such as Google and Yahoo. You can write anything you think about the website, positive or negative.
Here is a link that describes how it all works in a little more detail:
https://www.blogdistributor.com/bloggers.php
Our system is set up so that bloggers can make more money with us than with any other blog-for-pay firm. In short, we are the middle man between you and the advertiser. We match the correct blogs with the correct advertisers, who pay us to do so. And then we pay you, the blogger on behalf of the advertiser. You only take the advertisements that you want and are comfortable with. In no way does this alter the owersship of your blog. You simply get paid to write postings on your blog that you choose to write. You do what you want, when you want. You decide what content to accept or decline.
To submit your blog, go to https://www.blogdistributor.com/bloggers_signup.php
If you have any questions, do visit the FAQ's area of the site: https://www.blogdistributor.com/bloggers_faq.php
If you have more than one blog, you are more than welcome to sign those up as well. If you have any other questions, please contact me at: blogdistributor@hotmail.com. I know some people might be worried, getting some random e-mail, so please do write me if you have any questions or concerns. Also do a search for us on Yahoo or Google and look for reviews.
Thanks,
David
Email – blogdistributor@hotmail.com
Phone - 702-317-4256
To remove yourself, please click here or reply to this e-mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
Hey Blogger - My name is David,
I have been searching the Internet for blogs that match our criteria and I wanted to invite you to become a paid blogger at Blog Distributor. (Please understand that I do not send this invitation to every blogger I come across, nor is this a guaranteed acceptance as we can't do a true review of the blog until it reaches our blog analysts').
Roughly 25% of bloggers are now being paid to write postings on their blogs, that are linked to websites. The value here is that, when a blog posting is linked to a website, that website will get higher rankings in the search engines, such as Google and Yahoo. You can write anything you think about the website, positive or negative.
Here is a link that describes how it all works in a little more detail:
https://www.blogdistributor.com/bloggers.php
Our system is set up so that bloggers can make more money with us than with any other blog-for-pay firm. In short, we are the middle man between you and the advertiser. We match the correct blogs with the correct advertisers, who pay us to do so. And then we pay you, the blogger on behalf of the advertiser. You only take the advertisements that you want and are comfortable with. In no way does this alter the owersship of your blog. You simply get paid to write postings on your blog that you choose to write. You do what you want, when you want. You decide what content to accept or decline.
To submit your blog, go to https://www.blogdistributor.com/bloggers_signup.php
If you have any questions, do visit the FAQ's area of the site: https://www.blogdistributor.com/bloggers_faq.php
If you have more than one blog, you are more than welcome to sign those up as well. If you have any other questions, please contact me at: blogdistributor@hotmail.com. I know some people might be worried, getting some random e-mail, so please do write me if you have any questions or concerns. Also do a search for us on Yahoo or Google and look for reviews.
Thanks,
David
Email – blogdistributor@hotmail.com
Phone - 702-317-4256
To remove yourself, please click here or reply to this e-mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
For any of you who got this e-mail and are looking for an answer, don't trust it. It will not be legit, and even if it is, you won't get any money. It's like doing door to door work for a glazing company where your wages are based on commission. You're better off going to Google or Yahoo directly. And anyway, if you're blogging to make money, get into proper journalism. Nobody reads this shit anyway!
Tags : Blogging
Friday, 20 November 2009
Thursday, 19 November 2009
Left 4 Dead 2 : Psychosocial
Tags : Left 4 Dead 2, Valve, Steam, Slipknot, Psychosocial, Gameplay, Scavenge, Survivor
Friday, 6 November 2009
Game Reviews: Halo 3 ODST
I have to say when I first started the game with a couple of players I found it kinda crap. For those of you that are sitting down for the first time to play this game with a couple of friends, be prepared to be dropped into the deep end. The hints that the game drops such as "find a medical kiosk" can be rather unhelpful as it gives no lead to where the kiosk might be. But this is fair enough because if it handed that on a plate to you and everything else in the game there would be no challenge.
The graphics are no different from Halo 3 so consider this as a massive expansion pack which, by the way, isn't really worth it. Halo 3: ODST is set just after you see the massive ship jump within the vicinity of the city in the original "Halo 3" game.
The aim of the game is to regroup with your squad using the various clues that you find along the way, which put together the storyline piece by piece. Going into the "Fire Fight" mode that has been so badly over rated, there's a definite let down in programming and internet connections. What I mean by this is that in Halo 3 if anyone in the game disappears, the game carries on and a new player is nominated host. In ODST, this isn't the case. If a player drops out, the game ends completely, losing any points you may have gained. Going into the Multi player mode, there's no real difference, other than the fact that Bungie are so kind to give you every single Halo 3 multi player map, even the ones from the mythic map pack, on a single disc...So for those of you who went out and spent your money on Halo 3: ODST, Bungie AND Microsoft have pretty much just laughed at you.
The graphics are no different from Halo 3 so consider this as a massive expansion pack which, by the way, isn't really worth it. Halo 3: ODST is set just after you see the massive ship jump within the vicinity of the city in the original "Halo 3" game.
The aim of the game is to regroup with your squad using the various clues that you find along the way, which put together the storyline piece by piece. Going into the "Fire Fight" mode that has been so badly over rated, there's a definite let down in programming and internet connections. What I mean by this is that in Halo 3 if anyone in the game disappears, the game carries on and a new player is nominated host. In ODST, this isn't the case. If a player drops out, the game ends completely, losing any points you may have gained. Going into the Multi player mode, there's no real difference, other than the fact that Bungie are so kind to give you every single Halo 3 multi player map, even the ones from the mythic map pack, on a single disc...So for those of you who went out and spent your money on Halo 3: ODST, Bungie AND Microsoft have pretty much just laughed at you.
Final Thought Byte : Final thoughts huh...? My final thoughts on Halo 3: ODST are that it is a good idea, it gives you a better insight into ANOTHER life inside the halo story...Ultimately, those of you that don't like ODST, or NOW don't like ODST (lol), do not trade in the game as the "Halo Reach Beta" is due, and we all know that NO ONE wants to miss that. Hopefully Halo Reach will NOT, repeat NOT, be anything like the previous games.
Tags : Game, Halo 3, ODST, Review
1. You know what gets my goat?
Bloody Gold for cash adverts!
It really pisses me off when some overly tanned blonde bimbo appears on my TV screen and shouts "GIVE US GOLD AND GET MONEY". I wouldn't mind so much if it was just a simple advert telling us their services, but they do the whole Ocean Finance trick of employing some retard to say "Like oh my god! I got £4000 for an ounce of shitty fools gold! Like awesome!". The fact that it's always, and I really do mean always, badly dubbed is like putting hydrochloric acid in our collective wounds. And! And! We pay for a bloody TV license, so we should be allowed to say no to these stupidly ridiculous adverts. Bastards...
And anyway, who is stupid enough to actually send off a load of gold in a plastic bag marked "Cash 4 gold"? With the postal strikes in the last couple of weeks of pay, do you really think a postman would pass up the opportunity of nicking some gold? It's not like people who send off their gold will have the sense, or the money, to use recorded post. So once you send it off you'll be lucky if you get anything. And if you do, it will only be around 2p anyway. These companies are just glorified pawn shops who are too cheap to actually buy a shop...
It really pisses me off when some overly tanned blonde bimbo appears on my TV screen and shouts "GIVE US GOLD AND GET MONEY". I wouldn't mind so much if it was just a simple advert telling us their services, but they do the whole Ocean Finance trick of employing some retard to say "Like oh my god! I got £4000 for an ounce of shitty fools gold! Like awesome!". The fact that it's always, and I really do mean always, badly dubbed is like putting hydrochloric acid in our collective wounds. And! And! We pay for a bloody TV license, so we should be allowed to say no to these stupidly ridiculous adverts. Bastards...
And anyway, who is stupid enough to actually send off a load of gold in a plastic bag marked "Cash 4 gold"? With the postal strikes in the last couple of weeks of pay, do you really think a postman would pass up the opportunity of nicking some gold? It's not like people who send off their gold will have the sense, or the money, to use recorded post. So once you send it off you'll be lucky if you get anything. And if you do, it will only be around 2p anyway. These companies are just glorified pawn shops who are too cheap to actually buy a shop...
Final Rave : So, the next time you see these adverts, please do me a favour. Call up these bastards, ask for a bag to be sent for you. Then wait for a couple of days until you receive the little plastic bag, which is probably not biodegradable and has the tendency to kill small seals, and put a letter in it saying "STOP SCROUNGING FROM OUR ALREADY DAMAGED ECONOMY YOU PRICKS!". Thank you and goodnight!
Tags : Gold, Postal Strike, Bastards
Thursday, 29 October 2009
Google Wave - Preview
We finally got our Preview invites to Google Wave, and to be honest, we aren't that impressed... yet.
We said before that we really liked the concept of Google Wave and that it had the possibility of becoming huge. The idea is that people communicate through one medium, which is highly customisable and flexes to your every needs. Waves are essentially strings of communication in the google sphere, where two people can add and remove people to any particular wave. This wave can be used for any purpose and can be augmented with a plethora of extensions and gadgets.
In this pure form, Google Wave sounds awesome. In practice though, Google have gone a bit too far with the Wave ideology. The interface is nice, but for some reasons you manage your invites, settings and profile through waves themselves. There is no "core" to Google Wave, nothing which you can differentiate as your preferences. This feels really alien and most people won't get it. Contact management also feels clunky. The current invite system lets you invite 20 people to Google Wave, but once they get invited the flawed integration with Google Contacts means that your contacts list will often screw up...simply put.
The use of www.appstore.com as the centre for google extensions feels a bit...odd. You would think that Google would integrate it directly, maybe make a special extensions page within Google Wave itself. The ideas of robots are cool too, they are effectively pieces of code that you can add to a wave for a certain function, such as translation. Unfortunately, you have to add these robots directly to your contacts list, instead of a separate list for robots and extensions.
A lack of email integration at the moment means that people can't use it full time. Once it becomes "backwards compatible" with e-mail, people and companies can start using Google Wave as a new communication tool. A lot of problems have to be sorted out before Google can say it's finished and some ways I feel that they have opened up the Preview way too early. I can understand that they want us to give feedback and build the future of Google Wave with us, but the hype was so high that people were expecting something close to being polished. People were expecting to help make tweaks, as opposed to suggesting massive changes to the whole system.
We said before that we really liked the concept of Google Wave and that it had the possibility of becoming huge. The idea is that people communicate through one medium, which is highly customisable and flexes to your every needs. Waves are essentially strings of communication in the google sphere, where two people can add and remove people to any particular wave. This wave can be used for any purpose and can be augmented with a plethora of extensions and gadgets.
In this pure form, Google Wave sounds awesome. In practice though, Google have gone a bit too far with the Wave ideology. The interface is nice, but for some reasons you manage your invites, settings and profile through waves themselves. There is no "core" to Google Wave, nothing which you can differentiate as your preferences. This feels really alien and most people won't get it. Contact management also feels clunky. The current invite system lets you invite 20 people to Google Wave, but once they get invited the flawed integration with Google Contacts means that your contacts list will often screw up...simply put.
The use of www.appstore.com as the centre for google extensions feels a bit...odd. You would think that Google would integrate it directly, maybe make a special extensions page within Google Wave itself. The ideas of robots are cool too, they are effectively pieces of code that you can add to a wave for a certain function, such as translation. Unfortunately, you have to add these robots directly to your contacts list, instead of a separate list for robots and extensions.
A lack of email integration at the moment means that people can't use it full time. Once it becomes "backwards compatible" with e-mail, people and companies can start using Google Wave as a new communication tool. A lot of problems have to be sorted out before Google can say it's finished and some ways I feel that they have opened up the Preview way too early. I can understand that they want us to give feedback and build the future of Google Wave with us, but the hype was so high that people were expecting something close to being polished. People were expecting to help make tweaks, as opposed to suggesting massive changes to the whole system.
Final Thought Byte : In essence, Google Wave is a nice idea, but it's badly implemented so far. There is a complete lack of manageability. I can understand that Google is trying to explore and exploit the Wave ideology, but there is a limit to how far you go. We will keep a very close eye on Google Wave and keep everyone updated.
Tags : Google, Wave, E-mail
Wednesday, 5 August 2009
Windows 7 Abrupt Halt
Our Windows 7 Review Week was brought to an abrupt halt due to unforeseen technical difficulties. What that means is that Windows 7 became unstable. Ever time we tried to start it up ,the boot would fail and it would try to fix itself by doing a Startup Repair. Usually we would have to do a System Restore to get it working again.
We've decided to postpone the rest of the review week until the full release of Windows 7. We will also re-post the original first half as a reminder.
We would like to apologise to anyone who actually bothered to read this.
We are also planning to test DirectX 11 through Vista as opposed to using the Beta that's in Windows 7 RC 7100. This will take a while to test though, so in the meantime we will be doing a re-re-review of the Storm8 games with added hints and tips.
We've decided to postpone the rest of the review week until the full release of Windows 7. We will also re-post the original first half as a reminder.
We would like to apologise to anyone who actually bothered to read this.
We are also planning to test DirectX 11 through Vista as opposed to using the Beta that's in Windows 7 RC 7100. This will take a while to test though, so in the meantime we will be doing a re-re-review of the Storm8 games with added hints and tips.
Tags : Windows 7
Wednesday, 29 July 2009
3. Windows 7 Review Week - What You See
Following on from the last review, it's time to show some pictures of Windows 7. We thought it would be best to just show you the various features with a short explanation of what they do. Just click on the thumbnails to see the full version of the image.
Desktop
This will be the first screen that you see. The first thing that you will notice is that the taskbar has got a good dose of steroids. It's now a lot bigger which apparently makes it easier for tablet pc users to navigate around Windows 7. You can, however, change the icon sizes which in turn reduces the size of the task bar to this :
Taskbar Preview
This was a feature which was available in Vista, however it has gotten a bit of a makeover to make it a lot more functional. The way the taskbar now works, which is by automatically clumping similar windows together under the same icon, forces you to use it.
Aeropeek
This feature is aesthetically pleasing, but to be honest I don't really know when you would use it. It's a bit like that Windows shuffle thing in Vista. It looks nice, but it's mostly useless.
Start
This part of Windows 7 hasn't really changed since Vista. It holds all the usual things like programs and access to your files and folders. One added feature, however, is the ability to do more with programs before they even start.
In principal this is a nice idea, unfortunately it doesn't quite work properly yet.
Icons
Moving along the taskbar now towards the other end is the usual taskbar icons. You will be able to customise which icons are shown and what information they display. It adds an extra layer of customizability.
Action Centre
The Action Centre is the replacement to Vista's Security pages. It handles a lot of programs that look after your PC's safety. It hasn't really changed that much since Vista.
Libraries
We're now entering unfamiliar ground in terms of new features. In Windows 7 your documents will be managed under Libraries, which allow you to place your folders anywhere. This opens up the possibility of using multiple hard drives without compromising on functionality.
Personalisation
Again this is a feature taken from Vista but with a bit of a facelift. There is a little bit more control over how Windows 7 looks with the added feature of having a slideshow for your background. It's a nice little touch and keeps your desktop looking fresh.
Control Panel
Generally speaking the Control Panel hasn't changed at all. It looks a little clearer, but that's about it.
Internet Connection
Connecting to the Internet has become a lot easier in Windows 7. We allowed Windows 7 to install drivers to our WiFi card which meant that we were surfing the web within 5 minutes. Again, this feature has gotten a bit of a facelift since Vista.
Devices
The devices screen has been split from it's normal home within My Computer. This is great news because we finally manage everything from one place. Microsoft is really going for intuitive design this time.
Media Player
And last but not least is the new Windows Media Player. No one really uses it these days, but it's gone away from that dark look and has been transformed into a sleek looking, yet fully integrated, media application.
So that's really what you'll be getting when you buy Windows 7. Microsoft may pull some more features out of the bag before the release, but essentially that's your lot. It looks very much like Vista, especially if you choose to have smaller icons on the taskbar. We like what they have done. Everything has become very functional.
Desktop
This will be the first screen that you see. The first thing that you will notice is that the taskbar has got a good dose of steroids. It's now a lot bigger which apparently makes it easier for tablet pc users to navigate around Windows 7. You can, however, change the icon sizes which in turn reduces the size of the task bar to this :
Taskbar Preview
This was a feature which was available in Vista, however it has gotten a bit of a makeover to make it a lot more functional. The way the taskbar now works, which is by automatically clumping similar windows together under the same icon, forces you to use it.
Aeropeek
This feature is aesthetically pleasing, but to be honest I don't really know when you would use it. It's a bit like that Windows shuffle thing in Vista. It looks nice, but it's mostly useless.
Start
This part of Windows 7 hasn't really changed since Vista. It holds all the usual things like programs and access to your files and folders. One added feature, however, is the ability to do more with programs before they even start.
In principal this is a nice idea, unfortunately it doesn't quite work properly yet.
Icons
Moving along the taskbar now towards the other end is the usual taskbar icons. You will be able to customise which icons are shown and what information they display. It adds an extra layer of customizability.
Action Centre
The Action Centre is the replacement to Vista's Security pages. It handles a lot of programs that look after your PC's safety. It hasn't really changed that much since Vista.
Libraries
We're now entering unfamiliar ground in terms of new features. In Windows 7 your documents will be managed under Libraries, which allow you to place your folders anywhere. This opens up the possibility of using multiple hard drives without compromising on functionality.
Personalisation
Again this is a feature taken from Vista but with a bit of a facelift. There is a little bit more control over how Windows 7 looks with the added feature of having a slideshow for your background. It's a nice little touch and keeps your desktop looking fresh.
Control Panel
Generally speaking the Control Panel hasn't changed at all. It looks a little clearer, but that's about it.
Internet Connection
Connecting to the Internet has become a lot easier in Windows 7. We allowed Windows 7 to install drivers to our WiFi card which meant that we were surfing the web within 5 minutes. Again, this feature has gotten a bit of a facelift since Vista.
Devices
The devices screen has been split from it's normal home within My Computer. This is great news because we finally manage everything from one place. Microsoft is really going for intuitive design this time.
Media Player
And last but not least is the new Windows Media Player. No one really uses it these days, but it's gone away from that dark look and has been transformed into a sleek looking, yet fully integrated, media application.
So that's really what you'll be getting when you buy Windows 7. Microsoft may pull some more features out of the bag before the release, but essentially that's your lot. It looks very much like Vista, especially if you choose to have smaller icons on the taskbar. We like what they have done. Everything has become very functional.
Come up next : Tomorrow we will be covering Windows 7 Tweaks
Tags : Windows 7, Aero peek, control panel, personalisation, media player, libraries
Tuesday, 28 July 2009
2. Windows 7 Review Week - First Gaze
In our introduction to our special Windows 7 Review Week we covered the basics of the story behind what Windows 7 is. Many people will claim that Microsoft is just trying to sell a working copy of Vista, and in certain ways they would be correct. This review will go over the first stages of your experience with Windows 7, from the purchase to your first tentative gaze upon the unsurprisingly similar looks.
The heads at Microsoft are waiting for the shit to really hit the fan with the release of Windows 7. Every product they have released since Windows 95 has always had a major hiccup at the beginning. In the coming months, however, Microsoft has really been trying their best to get everyone on board. The cynical amongst you may feel that Microsoft is trying to pull the wool over your head and to force you to pay for a product you thought you already had. A lot of bloggers out there will be using the phrase “Windows 7 is what Vista was meant to be!” , but wouldn’t you be a bit pissed off if you had to spend twice as much to actually get what you thought you had in the first place? This is essentially the controversy surrounding Windows 7, why should we have to pay for something that could be released as a Service Pack? The simple answer is that Microsoft has actually done a lot of work on Windows 7, a lot of work that costs a lot. They know that most people will not be rushing to the shops to buy a copy, but they also know that the work they have put into creating Windows 7 will have to be filtered down to Vista users. This means that Microsoft has to somehow cover its costs for releasing DirectX 11 and all those security updates to XP and Vista users, and the easiest way to do this is to release a new OS and to charge normal prices for it. In a bid to get the money flowing, Microsoft has released a very limited number of copies for pre-order. In the UK, we were tempted with a £49 price tag for Windows 7 Home Premium. Unfortunately we can’t get the upgrade version because the EU has banned Microsoft from selling Windows with Internet Explorer. Which is ridiculous considering all the other browsers can only be downloaded using IE. Anyway, putting aside this ridiculous requirement, those of you who really want a copy will be sorely disappointed if you didn’t get in quick for the pre-order. All the copies that were selling for £49 are gone, which just leaves the normal price of £70, which will then be hiked up to about £140 next January. The reason there is a big step up is that Microsoft is compensating for the fact that they can’t release IE in CD form yet.
So, this brings us to our first milestone. If you want Windows 7 without having to pay through the nose, go to Amazon and pre-order it for £70. We’ve been living with Windows RC now for 3 days, and our advice is to go and buy it if you need it. I for one will be spending the £70 on a copy; however, I will be keeping it in my drawer for a couple of months. The reason for this is that although Microsoft has done a great job with the current Release Candidate, it is not worth risking all your data yet. We suggest that if you want Windows 7 ,to buy it but wait at least 6 months before committing to it 100%. So, assuming that you’ve bought a copy, we’ll move onto our second milestone.
Installing Windows 7 from scratch is a breeze. Before you start, you will need to enter your BIOS and change your boot options. When your computer starts there should be a button you have to press to enter your BIOS, it’s usually something like F10 or F12. Once you are in your BIOS, go to boot options and make sure that your PC is trying to boot from your DVD drive first. Once you’ve done that, just stick in the DVD and follow all the instructions on screen. Generally speaking, it’s fairly simple. The installation is very similar to Vista’s installation, however this time you’ll have the option between 32 bit and 64 bit. We suggest that you back everything up and go with 64-bit, assuming that you’ve waited for 6 months. The reason we suggest this is that most people will have 64-bit capable PC’s, which will benefit greatly from a 64-bit OS. Essentially it makes your CPU (Central Processing Unit), twice as effective and it lets you install a lot more RAM. In essence this will break through all the old performance celings. The installation will take a while as everything gets unpacked onto your newly formatted drive, although this is not necessary. Unlike Vista, the Windows 7 installation will actually let you install over your original Vista instalment, and it will just move everything into a folder called Windows.old. This is a nice little feature if you can’t find a way of backing up everything. Once the installation is done, the computer will restart. We suggest that before Windows starts up for the first time that you take the DVD out. This will stop you from installing the whole thing again and again. When Windows boots up for the first time you’ll be taken through a few screens that will set up basic user preferences.
If you don’t feel like waiting 6 months, however, there is another way that you can use Windows 7 without having to commit completely. What you have to do is create a second partition on your hard drive so that you can Multi-Boot Windows 7 and Vista. If you’re currently using Vista, go to Control Panel > Administrative Tools > Computer Management and then click on Disk Management. Once there, click on your Primary Hard Drive and click Shrink. You need to make sure you have plenty of space on it, we suggest you have at least a 500 GB hard drive with 250 GB free to shrink. Once your Hard Drive is shrunk, you will have unallocated space. Leave that space for now and follow the normal Windows 7 Installation. When you install it, make sure you go for the Custom option and then choose your unallocated partition. The windows 7 Installation will automatically format this unallocated space and install Windows 7 on the partition. This means that when you boot up, you will have the choice between starting Windows 7 and Windows Vista. Once you’re completely happy with Windows 7 you can go ahead and back up all your data ready for a clean install. You will have to format and extend the primary partition so that it takes up the whole hard drive again.
So what about people with laptops? Well, generally speaking we would advise against messing with anything. However, this time around we’ll be going against the grain a little. The current Release Candidate of Windows 7 has much better performance than Windows Vista. It is also easier to customise and to keep in check. So in actual fact we suggest that you do purchase a copy of Windows 7 and install it when everything is completely ironed out. You will find that your laptop will be given a new bill of health, saving you from having to buy a new one for at least a couple more years.
When you first start Windows 7 you will notice the nice new background to the log in screen, you will also notice a bigger task bar. The windows themselves, however, remain completely unchanged since Windows Vista. I can guarantee that your first reaction to Windows 7 will be “why the hell did I spend money on this?”. In our next review we will be exploring what’s new about Windows 7 in a hope that it will justify spending those precious pennies.
The heads at Microsoft are waiting for the shit to really hit the fan with the release of Windows 7. Every product they have released since Windows 95 has always had a major hiccup at the beginning. In the coming months, however, Microsoft has really been trying their best to get everyone on board. The cynical amongst you may feel that Microsoft is trying to pull the wool over your head and to force you to pay for a product you thought you already had. A lot of bloggers out there will be using the phrase “Windows 7 is what Vista was meant to be!” , but wouldn’t you be a bit pissed off if you had to spend twice as much to actually get what you thought you had in the first place? This is essentially the controversy surrounding Windows 7, why should we have to pay for something that could be released as a Service Pack? The simple answer is that Microsoft has actually done a lot of work on Windows 7, a lot of work that costs a lot. They know that most people will not be rushing to the shops to buy a copy, but they also know that the work they have put into creating Windows 7 will have to be filtered down to Vista users. This means that Microsoft has to somehow cover its costs for releasing DirectX 11 and all those security updates to XP and Vista users, and the easiest way to do this is to release a new OS and to charge normal prices for it. In a bid to get the money flowing, Microsoft has released a very limited number of copies for pre-order. In the UK, we were tempted with a £49 price tag for Windows 7 Home Premium. Unfortunately we can’t get the upgrade version because the EU has banned Microsoft from selling Windows with Internet Explorer. Which is ridiculous considering all the other browsers can only be downloaded using IE. Anyway, putting aside this ridiculous requirement, those of you who really want a copy will be sorely disappointed if you didn’t get in quick for the pre-order. All the copies that were selling for £49 are gone, which just leaves the normal price of £70, which will then be hiked up to about £140 next January. The reason there is a big step up is that Microsoft is compensating for the fact that they can’t release IE in CD form yet.
So, this brings us to our first milestone. If you want Windows 7 without having to pay through the nose, go to Amazon and pre-order it for £70. We’ve been living with Windows RC now for 3 days, and our advice is to go and buy it if you need it. I for one will be spending the £70 on a copy; however, I will be keeping it in my drawer for a couple of months. The reason for this is that although Microsoft has done a great job with the current Release Candidate, it is not worth risking all your data yet. We suggest that if you want Windows 7 ,to buy it but wait at least 6 months before committing to it 100%. So, assuming that you’ve bought a copy, we’ll move onto our second milestone.
Installing Windows 7 from scratch is a breeze. Before you start, you will need to enter your BIOS and change your boot options. When your computer starts there should be a button you have to press to enter your BIOS, it’s usually something like F10 or F12. Once you are in your BIOS, go to boot options and make sure that your PC is trying to boot from your DVD drive first. Once you’ve done that, just stick in the DVD and follow all the instructions on screen. Generally speaking, it’s fairly simple. The installation is very similar to Vista’s installation, however this time you’ll have the option between 32 bit and 64 bit. We suggest that you back everything up and go with 64-bit, assuming that you’ve waited for 6 months. The reason we suggest this is that most people will have 64-bit capable PC’s, which will benefit greatly from a 64-bit OS. Essentially it makes your CPU (Central Processing Unit), twice as effective and it lets you install a lot more RAM. In essence this will break through all the old performance celings. The installation will take a while as everything gets unpacked onto your newly formatted drive, although this is not necessary. Unlike Vista, the Windows 7 installation will actually let you install over your original Vista instalment, and it will just move everything into a folder called Windows.old. This is a nice little feature if you can’t find a way of backing up everything. Once the installation is done, the computer will restart. We suggest that before Windows starts up for the first time that you take the DVD out. This will stop you from installing the whole thing again and again. When Windows boots up for the first time you’ll be taken through a few screens that will set up basic user preferences.
If you don’t feel like waiting 6 months, however, there is another way that you can use Windows 7 without having to commit completely. What you have to do is create a second partition on your hard drive so that you can Multi-Boot Windows 7 and Vista. If you’re currently using Vista, go to Control Panel > Administrative Tools > Computer Management and then click on Disk Management. Once there, click on your Primary Hard Drive and click Shrink. You need to make sure you have plenty of space on it, we suggest you have at least a 500 GB hard drive with 250 GB free to shrink. Once your Hard Drive is shrunk, you will have unallocated space. Leave that space for now and follow the normal Windows 7 Installation. When you install it, make sure you go for the Custom option and then choose your unallocated partition. The windows 7 Installation will automatically format this unallocated space and install Windows 7 on the partition. This means that when you boot up, you will have the choice between starting Windows 7 and Windows Vista. Once you’re completely happy with Windows 7 you can go ahead and back up all your data ready for a clean install. You will have to format and extend the primary partition so that it takes up the whole hard drive again.
So what about people with laptops? Well, generally speaking we would advise against messing with anything. However, this time around we’ll be going against the grain a little. The current Release Candidate of Windows 7 has much better performance than Windows Vista. It is also easier to customise and to keep in check. So in actual fact we suggest that you do purchase a copy of Windows 7 and install it when everything is completely ironed out. You will find that your laptop will be given a new bill of health, saving you from having to buy a new one for at least a couple more years.
When you first start Windows 7 you will notice the nice new background to the log in screen, you will also notice a bigger task bar. The windows themselves, however, remain completely unchanged since Windows Vista. I can guarantee that your first reaction to Windows 7 will be “why the hell did I spend money on this?”. In our next review we will be exploring what’s new about Windows 7 in a hope that it will justify spending those precious pennies.
Coming up next : What You See and What You Get, a review on the features that make up Windows 7.
Tags : Microsoft, Windows 7, Multi-Boot, Partition, Home Premium, £49
Monday, 27 July 2009
1. Windows 7 Review Week - Introduction
To start off our Windows 7 Review Week, which will feature a daily review on different aspects of the new Operating System , we thought it would be fitting to introduce Windows 7 and to give it a little bit of context.
The most contraversial part of Microsoft's recent ventures is the catastrophic failure of Windows Vista amongst the general public. Those of us who are somewhat savvy when it comes to computers have mixed views on Windows Vista, however the general public, as in those who are not somewhat savvy, have a deep deep, almost genetic, hate towards Windows Vista. Simply put, the reason that people hate Vista is because it sucked. When it was first released, Vista was plagued with massive compatability problems, huge stability problems and a complete lack of appropriate advertising. Microsoft had not swept the ground from the horrible muck that would eventually doom Vista to an early grave. So, in light of this, Microsoft set about creating the Operating System that Vista was meant to be.
So, we've got the basics of why Microsoft is releasing Windows 7, so now I'll quickly explain what an Operating System is, and why Microsoft is doing so well with Windows 7. For those of you who live in a dark cave somewhere, an Operating System is the software on your computer that makes it work. That means everything you see on your screen, excluding the Internet Browser, is your Operating System, or OS. Having a good OS, and sometimes having the right version, allows you to utilise your computer hardware better. The vast majority of people will be running Windows on their computer for the simple fact that everyone else is. Windows creates a level playing field and allows everybody to share information without any compatability problems. At least, this is what we expected of Vista. Unfortunately, Vista was so badly coded that it did not even fill this basic requirement until much later on.
Fortunately for us, Microsoft has actually done a very thorough job with Windows 7. Straight from the start, Microsoft took on board the problems of Windows Vista, and straight from the start Microsoft began to prepare the ground. There have been months and months of open dialogue between Microsoft and it's users, with early releases of Windows 7 all the way through. Microsoft has been talking to all the major OEM's, Original Equipment Manufacturer, and has promised a smooth transition. Something which can definitely be delivered because Microsoft has already released Windows 7 to the public as a Release Candidate. All this PR work and solid coding with input from the rest of us has made a surprisingly solid Operating System. Microsoft has learned from it's previous mistakes and knows that it's reputation depends on the absolute success of Windows 7. However, much like Vista, Windows 7 well be coming in different versions. Unless you buy a new computer, you'll be trying to choose between Windows 7 Home Premium, Professional or Ultimate. I don't see why they can't just sell the same product to everyone. One major step forward, however, is the amalgamation of 32-bit and 64-bit OS's. Microsoft tried to break into 64-bit computing with Vista, however by charging separately for them, it failed to do so. Windows 7 will come with both versions, which means 64-bit should become the new standard.
Generally speaking, everything that Microsoft has done so far to ease Windows 7 into the world, has worked. Backed up by solid performances, Windows 7 is expected to be a total success. However, it is down to people like us to review Windows 7 to see whether it lives up to the expectations.
The most contraversial part of Microsoft's recent ventures is the catastrophic failure of Windows Vista amongst the general public. Those of us who are somewhat savvy when it comes to computers have mixed views on Windows Vista, however the general public, as in those who are not somewhat savvy, have a deep deep, almost genetic, hate towards Windows Vista. Simply put, the reason that people hate Vista is because it sucked. When it was first released, Vista was plagued with massive compatability problems, huge stability problems and a complete lack of appropriate advertising. Microsoft had not swept the ground from the horrible muck that would eventually doom Vista to an early grave. So, in light of this, Microsoft set about creating the Operating System that Vista was meant to be.
So, we've got the basics of why Microsoft is releasing Windows 7, so now I'll quickly explain what an Operating System is, and why Microsoft is doing so well with Windows 7. For those of you who live in a dark cave somewhere, an Operating System is the software on your computer that makes it work. That means everything you see on your screen, excluding the Internet Browser, is your Operating System, or OS. Having a good OS, and sometimes having the right version, allows you to utilise your computer hardware better. The vast majority of people will be running Windows on their computer for the simple fact that everyone else is. Windows creates a level playing field and allows everybody to share information without any compatability problems. At least, this is what we expected of Vista. Unfortunately, Vista was so badly coded that it did not even fill this basic requirement until much later on.
Fortunately for us, Microsoft has actually done a very thorough job with Windows 7. Straight from the start, Microsoft took on board the problems of Windows Vista, and straight from the start Microsoft began to prepare the ground. There have been months and months of open dialogue between Microsoft and it's users, with early releases of Windows 7 all the way through. Microsoft has been talking to all the major OEM's, Original Equipment Manufacturer, and has promised a smooth transition. Something which can definitely be delivered because Microsoft has already released Windows 7 to the public as a Release Candidate. All this PR work and solid coding with input from the rest of us has made a surprisingly solid Operating System. Microsoft has learned from it's previous mistakes and knows that it's reputation depends on the absolute success of Windows 7. However, much like Vista, Windows 7 well be coming in different versions. Unless you buy a new computer, you'll be trying to choose between Windows 7 Home Premium, Professional or Ultimate. I don't see why they can't just sell the same product to everyone. One major step forward, however, is the amalgamation of 32-bit and 64-bit OS's. Microsoft tried to break into 64-bit computing with Vista, however by charging separately for them, it failed to do so. Windows 7 will come with both versions, which means 64-bit should become the new standard.
Generally speaking, everything that Microsoft has done so far to ease Windows 7 into the world, has worked. Backed up by solid performances, Windows 7 is expected to be a total success. However, it is down to people like us to review Windows 7 to see whether it lives up to the expectations.
Coming up next : We will be reviewing the installation of Windows 7
Tags : Microsoft, Windows 7, Release Candidate
Sunday, 26 July 2009
Windows 7 Review Week
We have just got our hands on a copy of the Windows 7 Release Candidate. To celebrate this momentous occasion, we will be doing daily reviews as part of our "Windows 7 Review Week". To make sure that everybody can access these reviews, we will be creating and updating a special Windows 7 Review Week list. We haven't quite got a name for it yet, but basically you will be able to easily get to any of our reviews.
Starting tomorrow, with our introduction, we will be covering the installation, how it looks and works, DirectX 11, a Vista - Win 7 Comparison and lots of other bits and pieces. These reviews will be written whilst we learn to live with the new OS and will, if everything goes well, be published everyday for 7 days.
So, stay tuned for our Windows 7 Review Week!
Starting tomorrow, with our introduction, we will be covering the installation, how it looks and works, DirectX 11, a Vista - Win 7 Comparison and lots of other bits and pieces. These reviews will be written whilst we learn to live with the new OS and will, if everything goes well, be published everyday for 7 days.
So, stay tuned for our Windows 7 Review Week!
Tags : Microsoft, Windows 7, Review, DirectX 11
Thursday, 23 July 2009
Medal of Honor Airborne
First things first, it's a Medal of Honor game. It's spelt wrong, it's probably historically incorrect and the Nazi's only ever have one thing say ; "Ich Habe!". That pretty much sums up the whole series, and Airborne is no exception. Graphically, it's not too bad. It's built on the UT3 engine, unsurprisingly, which gives it that sort of...shiny-but-in-the-wrong-place look. For some reason anything that has highlights will look completely wrong.
Putting that aside, however, Airborne did surprise me a little. The first mission is pretty straight forward. You land in a small Italian town and you kill a load of Nazi's until you win. There is only ever two types of objective, the first is where you blow stuff up, and the second is where you kill Nazi's and then blow stuff up. All in all, pretty simple gameplay. The storyline is your usual Medal of Honor thing. You follow a 'historic' campaign where you blow things up in the hope that you start feeling all patriotic and anti-German again. I swear the US government just forced EA to keep making these games so that they can convert those filthy "Nazi-Lovin' Bastards!" into outstanding citizens. Or maybe people just think its fun to kill Nazi's...
By far the best part of the whole game, after running through a little Italian town, Nijmegen and reliving Operation Varsity , is right at the end where you single handedly blown up the 'Flak Tower'. At each level a new opposing Nazi AI is offered to you as sacrifice, each with his own gun and one liner. Instead of having a mix in each level, EA has opted for a clone army to descend upon you. At the end it just gets silly when you're trampled on by a shit load of elite Nazi's with massive machine guns that chop you to bits. I must admit though, hiding around the corner and killing the lot of them got my heart pumping for a little bit.
There are other perks to game that make it different to most WWII games. Firstly, of course, is the whole jumping out of a plane thing. In a couple of the missions it will go through a whole rigmarole of killing off a few of your buddies and in the last mission the whole plane just explodes. Secondly, whenever you die, you get the jump out of a plane again. This means that you can start the mission in any place that you want. It makes things a little bit more interesting, and according to EA, more difficult for the AI. I just think that's their excuse for coding it in badly. As far as I can see, the AI for MoH Airborne is just as shit as the original.
That said, the game doesn't exactly have a lot of longevity as a single player game. Gone are the days when games like Halo or Fable were released, where you could play for hours everyday and still not get any closer to the absolutely epic ending. Considering that games cost millions to make, you would expect more than a couple of hours of interesting and original game play. So when you buy this from your local shop, don't expect a game that will keep you interested for more than a week.
Putting that aside, however, Airborne did surprise me a little. The first mission is pretty straight forward. You land in a small Italian town and you kill a load of Nazi's until you win. There is only ever two types of objective, the first is where you blow stuff up, and the second is where you kill Nazi's and then blow stuff up. All in all, pretty simple gameplay. The storyline is your usual Medal of Honor thing. You follow a 'historic' campaign where you blow things up in the hope that you start feeling all patriotic and anti-German again. I swear the US government just forced EA to keep making these games so that they can convert those filthy "Nazi-Lovin' Bastards!" into outstanding citizens. Or maybe people just think its fun to kill Nazi's...
By far the best part of the whole game, after running through a little Italian town, Nijmegen and reliving Operation Varsity , is right at the end where you single handedly blown up the 'Flak Tower'. At each level a new opposing Nazi AI is offered to you as sacrifice, each with his own gun and one liner. Instead of having a mix in each level, EA has opted for a clone army to descend upon you. At the end it just gets silly when you're trampled on by a shit load of elite Nazi's with massive machine guns that chop you to bits. I must admit though, hiding around the corner and killing the lot of them got my heart pumping for a little bit.
There are other perks to game that make it different to most WWII games. Firstly, of course, is the whole jumping out of a plane thing. In a couple of the missions it will go through a whole rigmarole of killing off a few of your buddies and in the last mission the whole plane just explodes. Secondly, whenever you die, you get the jump out of a plane again. This means that you can start the mission in any place that you want. It makes things a little bit more interesting, and according to EA, more difficult for the AI. I just think that's their excuse for coding it in badly. As far as I can see, the AI for MoH Airborne is just as shit as the original.
That said, the game doesn't exactly have a lot of longevity as a single player game. Gone are the days when games like Halo or Fable were released, where you could play for hours everyday and still not get any closer to the absolutely epic ending. Considering that games cost millions to make, you would expect more than a couple of hours of interesting and original game play. So when you buy this from your local shop, don't expect a game that will keep you interested for more than a week.
Final Thought Byte : It's not a bad game, per se, just a bit unoriginal. If you like shooting Nazi's, then you might as well buy it. It wont make you go 'ZOMG WOW!', but it will fill your Nazi killing desires.
Tags : EA, Medal of Honor : Airborne, Nazi's
GRID Revisited
With the arrival of FUEL, Codemasters new racing game, and a possible patch for GRID on the horizon, we offer our thoughts on GRID a year after our first review.
Essentially, the game is the same. Since our last review, however, I have upgraded my rig and can actually play GRID on max settings. Last July I tried my best to emphasize how graphically stunning the game was. Now playing at full resolution and having all the options turned to max, the graphics are still jaw dropping a year on. We shall see how FUEL fairs up to the standard that GRID has set.
In terms of gaming advancement, GRID does not really pull anything new out of the magical top hat. Gran Turismo 3 on the PS2 was the first driving game to look truly realistic, something which GRID has done but something it hasn't really improved on. Don't get me wrong, it looks amazing, but it isn't the first time that we've been amazed at how cool a game looks. When GRID was released, the idea and implimentation of PhysX , artificial real time physics calculated by the GPU, was still fiddly at best. You will still see bits flying off cars, but they might not land correctly or just get stuck in the road pointing straight up. These physics glitches are common, but not something to be worried about when you're driving into things at 200mph.
The gameplay hasn't changed in the last year, obviously because there haven't been any patches. It's a very very simple racing game. You get in your car, you drive, get money and buy new cars. There's no tuning, no tweaking, just simple driving. Which, for most of us, is a recipe for 'kick ass'. For most gamers, GRID will be about relaxing, not having to think and just flowing with the road, choosing the right racing line... and trying not to crash.
The online gameplay, however, has changed quite a bit. A year on, the original people that played the game have gone elsewhere. Suprisingly though, you will still find a dozen games to join. The majority of sessions seem to be the Bridgestone Championship, but sometimes you will find a GT1 race or even a couple Japan Drifts. Unfortunately, I can guarantee that you'll be shouting "Fucking crashers!" at your monitor within 30 seconds. A huge majority of players on GRID these days tend to be from a country you've never heard of and speak a language you can't even begin to understand. That's not so much of a problem, because during races you can't type and there is no voice support, however they do tend to crash into you for fun. Everynow and again, you may find a group of good drivers which will give you a good race, and these can generally be found in smaller sessions. This leads us to the conclusion that huge sessions with 10 or more players is a situation you want to avoid like the plague.
Essentially, the game is the same. Since our last review, however, I have upgraded my rig and can actually play GRID on max settings. Last July I tried my best to emphasize how graphically stunning the game was. Now playing at full resolution and having all the options turned to max, the graphics are still jaw dropping a year on. We shall see how FUEL fairs up to the standard that GRID has set.
In terms of gaming advancement, GRID does not really pull anything new out of the magical top hat. Gran Turismo 3 on the PS2 was the first driving game to look truly realistic, something which GRID has done but something it hasn't really improved on. Don't get me wrong, it looks amazing, but it isn't the first time that we've been amazed at how cool a game looks. When GRID was released, the idea and implimentation of PhysX , artificial real time physics calculated by the GPU, was still fiddly at best. You will still see bits flying off cars, but they might not land correctly or just get stuck in the road pointing straight up. These physics glitches are common, but not something to be worried about when you're driving into things at 200mph.
The gameplay hasn't changed in the last year, obviously because there haven't been any patches. It's a very very simple racing game. You get in your car, you drive, get money and buy new cars. There's no tuning, no tweaking, just simple driving. Which, for most of us, is a recipe for 'kick ass'. For most gamers, GRID will be about relaxing, not having to think and just flowing with the road, choosing the right racing line... and trying not to crash.
The online gameplay, however, has changed quite a bit. A year on, the original people that played the game have gone elsewhere. Suprisingly though, you will still find a dozen games to join. The majority of sessions seem to be the Bridgestone Championship, but sometimes you will find a GT1 race or even a couple Japan Drifts. Unfortunately, I can guarantee that you'll be shouting "Fucking crashers!" at your monitor within 30 seconds. A huge majority of players on GRID these days tend to be from a country you've never heard of and speak a language you can't even begin to understand. That's not so much of a problem, because during races you can't type and there is no voice support, however they do tend to crash into you for fun. Everynow and again, you may find a group of good drivers which will give you a good race, and these can generally be found in smaller sessions. This leads us to the conclusion that huge sessions with 10 or more players is a situation you want to avoid like the plague.
Final Thought Byte : The conclusion is fairly simple. Without a single grain of doubt, GRID is still a good game. If you just want to relax and drive around in a car that looks cool, go down to your nearest shop and pick it up for a few quid. The new patch may bring a few improvements, but I really doubt it.
Tags : FUEL, Codemasters, GRID, GT3
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
